As I lie in bed on another rainy morning, missing my landscape photography, I set my alarm early today but after checking all the relevant webcams and weather reports, it was clear this day was going to be halted by the rain once more. This got me thinking about film photography again. I found myself hunting Instagram for inspiration - there are so many talented photographers out there once you sift through all the AI “art” frauds!
Anyway, I digress. I want my journey into film to be considered, slow, and progressive - no quick fixes. I’m learning all over again!
Following on from my last post about shifting from full-frame digital to medium format (both analogue and digital) in pursuit of that smoother, more cinematic depth, I’ve now properly started using the Hasselblad 500C/M for analogue work. I’ll still be shooting digital with my X2D II as well, and I’m very much looking forward to using the two together - the X2D II for its incredible colour and tonal range in those crisp, detailed landscapes, and the 500C/M for the slower, more intentional analogue process that brings back the anticipation and imperfections I loved from my early days in photography.
To make this transition stick after years glued to digital capture for my landscape work, I’ve finally made the leap back to analogue with the Hasselblad 500C/M, and it’s already feeling like the right move. There’s something about the slower pace, the anticipation, and that unpredictable magic that digital just can’t touch. But I need to find the film stocks that really suit my atmospheric style: moody tones, cinematic depth, and that subtle imperfection that draws you in.
So this is the start of that journey: testing a handful of different emulsions over the coming months until I land on the ones that feel like home for my long-exposure landscapes and moody scenes. No rush - just honest experimenting and sharing what works (and what doesn’t) along the way.
To start with, I’ll only be shooting 120 medium format (6x6) on the Hasselblad - I might venture into 35mm later, but for now I’m keeping it focused on medium format to really explore that square frame and the depth it can bring.
The stocks I’m planning to try first are:
Lomochrome Metropolis (for those surreal, urban-inspired colour shifts)
CineStill 50D (low ISO, fine grain, daylight-balanced for clean, cinematic looks)
Portra 400 (the classic - forgiving, natural colours, great latitude)
Tri-X 400 (black & white staple - gritty contrast and tonality)
CineStill 400D (daylight tungsten hybrid for warmer, filmic vibes)
CineStill 800 (low-light king with halation glow)
Portra 160 (medium format version of the favourite)
Gold 200 (already started - affordable, punchy colours for everyday tests)
I’ve kicked things off with a roll of Kodak Gold 200 in 120 format. It’s a daylight-balanced ISO 200 colour negative film known for its combination of fine grain, high sharpness, and vibrant saturation, with broad exposure latitude that makes it forgiving even if exposure isn’t spot on. As a budget-friendly “consumer” stock, it’s surprisingly capable - warm tones, nice punchy colours, and reliable results.
Here are a few frames from that first test roll (not great compositions, as these were really just to check the camera mechanics after such a long break from Hasselblad loading). The shots are from the Brownstone Daymark in Kingswear - it was a bright evening and conditions I’d not normally shoot, but I was itching to get out and test the camera between all the rain showers! Luckily, the camera is working fine overall, with just one overlapping frame down to my user error - it’s been ages since I loaded one properly! I’m quite impressed with Gold 200 though; the colours are nice and lively, the grain is pleasant and not overpowering, but it’s maybe a little too saturated and punchy for my usual more subdued, atmospheric style.
The lab results and scans are really impressive with some beautiful natural colours (tonal and contrast tweaks only)
Another scan from the lab - shot during the golden hour. Natural colours from the Kodak Gold (no edit)
To keep everything consistent and high-quality, I’m sending my films to FilmProcessing.co.uk in Plymouth. They’re only a short drive away for me (being fairly local in the South West), but they also offer a straightforward online option to send your films by post - making the whole process really easy and accessible for anyone looking to try film for the first time or get back into it after a break. Their prices are very competitive too, which is a nice bonus when you’re experimenting with multiple rolls.
I visited the lab recently, and it was like stepping back into a 90s high street photo place: organised, efficient, run by people who clearly love film. Watching my 120 roll go through their in-house process - from development to high-res scans - was reassuring. The scans came back sharp and detailed, with all the natural grain and character preserved - no over-processed digital sheen. They handle both 35mm and 120 properly using legacy equipment like the Fujifilm FP563SC processor (an industrial-grade machine for high-throughput C-41 development, handling 120 among other formats with automated chemistry via Fujifilm’s CN-16S system) and scanners such as the Fuji Frontier SP3000 or Noritsu HS-1800 (professional CCD units known for excellent colour science, high resolution, and IR dust/scratch removal). It’s exactly the kind of authentic, no-shortcuts setup that gives me confidence in the results while I experiment.
Once I receive the negatives back, I’ll also be trying my own scanning using the Valoi Easy 120 setup. I plan to process the scans through Negative Lab Pro in Lightroom, which I’ve heard gives excellent colour inversion and control over the film look. I’m still getting to grips with Negative Lab Pro, but first impressions are great – it’s already looking like a really powerful way to bring out the true character of the negatives at home. It’ll be interesting to compare my home scans with the lab’s high-res files and see how they hold up for my workflow.
Scanned using the X2DII & Valoi Easy 120 at home – I’ve left this one intentionally dark, shot it around two stops under exposed.Unfortunately my old Zeiss Macro lens has a heavy vignette, so I’m now looking at a different lens option for the X2D II that will allow me to scan the negatives cleanly without that vignetting issue. That said, I’m really pleased with how easy and quick the Valoi Easy 120 is to use for scanning – it’s a very straightforward setup once everything is in place.
I’d like to thank everyone who’s reached out and is willing to support my journey in its early stages - especially Sarah and the team at Film Processing for showing me around the lab and for their generosity with trial films. It’s already feeling like a natural fit.
This whole thing feels organic because it’s tied to my actual workflow: shooting more film, getting reliable processing nearby, and documenting the search for the right stock. Once I start getting shots back, I’ll write follow-ups on each one - how it renders in landscapes, what happens if I over- or under-expose it a bit, and whether it gives me the cinematic mood I’m chasing.
I think the film resurgence is only building. Digital can be too perfect sometimes, and with AI making everything feel a bit artificial online, people are craving something real - the wait, the physical negatives, the unique look. It’s similar to how vinyl bounced back: that tangible soul wins out.
Excited for what’s coming - first proper rolls incoming, results soon after. Watch this space for the stock-by-stock breakdowns.
Scanned with the Value Easy 120 and converted with Negative Lab Pro in Lightroom